2010, THE YEAR OF CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL

ACC Board Members See Opportunities in the Midst of Greater Regulatory Scrutiny, Increased Client Demands & Efficiency Directives in the New Year

As 2009 comes to a close, some will look back on the past year disheartened by the economic upheaval that occurred, while others will look ahead with cautious optimism, confident that in the midst of challenges the coming year will bring lucrative opportunities for growth and prosperity. Articles and Blog posts abound, with everyone offering their predictions for the coming year. While nobody has a magical crystal ball to foretell the future, we can learn from events of the past and the current environment to not only predict, but also prepare, for what is yet to come.

I have always found our ACC community to be a great source of support and insight and as Ivan Fong, ACC’s former Board Chair, noted in a previous ACC Docket message, “During times of economic stress, it is important to hold fast to your core values and to the people … who can support you in your time of need and give you hope and inspiration.” By tapping into the collective wisdom of ACC’s Board of Directors, we can all glean added insight to stay on top of the trends – and help us to prepare for 2010. 

When asked what the greatest challenges will be for in-house counsel, as well as where new opportunities will emerge, ACC Board members offer the following predictions.

David Allgood, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Royal Bank of Canada: We will have to respond to the impact of the global financial crisis on financial regulations and I see a significant regulatory onslaught occurring, particularly for financial institutions.  

I am expecting - looking for, actually - more use of project management principles by the outside law firms I work with to ensure greater efficiency and cost containment.

Jonathan Block, Attorney, Former Vice President and General Counsel, Salem Communications Corporation: The current political winds are blowing in favor of increased regulation, and given the speed in which it is happening and the polarization of the political process, it is hard to know where we’ll land until we are already there.  With all of the changes, reduction in resources and increased pressure to take risks that will potentially jeopardize the company, the complexity of how in-house lawyers go about performing their job will continue to increase.  

The increased complexity and reduction in resources, however, provides an even greater opportunity for in-house lawyers to demonstrate their strategic value to the organization. With greater challenges facing companies, GCs have the opportunity to burnish their image as the go-to problem solver for the company. This is also a great time for companies to start building for the recovery and investing in their future. With even well run businesses having to eliminate assets to address cash flow issues over the past few years, strong companies now have the ability to acquire some especially valuable resources (including human capital) in a manner and at a price they previously couldn’t come close to. 

Jeffrey Carr, Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, FMC Technologies, Inc.: In-house counsel must determine how to make value-based engagements the standard for their own teams while simultaneously implementing value-based engagements with their outside counsel.  

In looking ahead, I see the ACC Value Index, the client satisfaction measurement tool developed to help ACC members share meaningful information about the value they get from their outside counsel, being recognized as the industry standard.

Elisa D. Garcia C., Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Office Depot, Inc.: For in-house lawyers with public companies, we will have to nimbly navigate an avalanche of new legislation and regulation in the governance arena. From proxy access to say-on-pay, from risk committees to golden parachutes, and all the enhanced disclosure requirements that will accompany these and other regulations, I foresee substantial confusion and lack of guidance from the regulators. This is especially concerning because of the “anti-corporate” bias of regulators. I hope the regulators work with the business community to ensure that the new rules are clear and enforced fairly.  

I encourage smaller and diverse [law] firms to embrace the ACC Value Challenge as a game changing differentiator. I think the agility of a smaller firm will enable it to be more creative in bringing value solutions to corporations and thereby helping them gain opportunities they may not have otherwise had.   

Michele Gatto, Executive Vice President, Corporate Services & Chief Legal Officer, National Life Group: In the current economic environment it will be incumbent on in-house counsel to manage expenses carefully and strategically, with a focus on increased efficiency, productivity and value. This is an opportunity for in-house lawyers to demonstrate their abilities to be good leaders, as well as good lawyers. We will also need to stay focused on new developments in the legislative and regulatory environment (financial services reform, health care reform, etc.).

J. Alberto Gonzalez-Pita, Senior Vice President & General Counsel, Las Vegas Sands Corporation:  Some trends are clearer than others, and increasing regulation is one that stands out. This will happen at the state and federal levels and will impact a wide-range of small and large businesses in numerous industries. I believe we will also see increasing enforcement of existing regulations with larger fines and penalties for non-compliance. Identifying, analyzing and complying with these regulations, as well as ameliorating their impact will require a significant investment of time and resources by in-house counsel.  Another trend is the continuation of the changing dynamics between companies and their outside counsel. The economic recovery is unlikely to be fast or robust enough to diminish ongoing cost cutting efforts, and outside counsel will continue to feel pressure on their fees. The ACC Value Challenge will continue to gain momentum as an effective way for in-house lawyers to achieve demonstrable savings and efficiencies. We will continue to see more alternative fee arrangements and less hourly rates through 2010 and beyond.

There will certainly be numerous changes in store for specific industries (banking and finance, insurance, health care, pharmaceutical and hydrocarbons), but I'm not a good enough prognosticator to say what those will be. "Legal" change is in the air more so than in years past, and I believe this will impact the vast majority of in-house lawyers in some fashion.

Teresa Kennedy, Assistant General Counsel, Cox Communications, Inc.: Lawyers will be stretched by handling more matters than ever in-house, with less support from our business partners.  This situation will require us to be more actively engaged in vetting business issues, which of course, presents us with both opportunities and challenges!

Jonathan Oviatt, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, Mayo Clinic:  We will continue to see increased expectation that legal services will measure up to the same metrics of "quality and value" that are applied to all other shared services in the organization. Effective lawyers will be those who intentionally partner with clients to improve quality and value, while reducing expenses.  With increased regulatory complexity and decreasing budgets, effective risk balancing and risk management skills are essential for effective lawyers.

"Tone at the Top" has never been more important and effective CLOs have a critical role in ensuring that our clients do the right thing. Additionally, it has never been more important for us to avoid taking ourselves too seriously—we must maintain balance.

Carol Ann Petren, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, CIGNA Corporation:The greatest challenges for in-house counsel will definitely include an increased focus on executive compensation and risk management. There should also be an increased willingness to take advantage of developing business opportunities with a more stable economy and clarity on the regulatory front.  

Eric Reicin, Senior Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Sallie Mae, Inc.: In times of stress, uncertainty and an enhanced regulatory environment, in-house counsel need to be more than practitioners, they need to serve as both a trusted advisor and business partner. During the last 20 years - especially the last five - we have seen a dramatic shift in the speed and efficiency of the practice of law with the addition of each new technology (overnight mail, fax, electronic word processing, electronic legal research, e-mail, e-filing/knowledge management, internet search, video conferencing, intranets, IM, BlackBerry, iPhones, Twitter and private secure social networks), and this trend will continue, mostly to the detriment of our personal lives and to the perceived benefit of our clients. It will continue to fall to us to encourage our clients to prioritize, recognize when immediate turn-around is required and when further thought is preferable. Thoughtful legal advice often takes more than 140 characters of text.

Martine Turcotte, EVP & Chief Legal & Regulatory Officer, Bell Canada: One of the major regulatory and investor areas of focus will be on executive compensation where more disclosure -similar to a management and discussion analysis focused on compensation – that is now required. While we had to go through this as one of the first Canadian issuers last year, regulators have kept a close eye on this, and now with “say on pay” resolutions having been adopted by a few issuers like ourselves, it will be an interesting discussion with governance organizations and major investors.   On the administration side, top focus will remain on outside counsel costs and the value proposal.   

Norman Wain, VP, Corporate Legal Affairs, Assistant General Counsel, The Finish Line, Inc.: I see our greatest challenge as balancing the corporate expectations while continuing to decrease (or manage) costs in light of tighter economic conditions. In-house counsel need to learn to work more efficiently, better manage outside counsel (perhaps changing fee structures) and then battle senior management to still pay attention to legal when they are desperately focused on reducing costs and cutting programs from their budgets.

In terms of prospects for the year ahead, technology is constantly changing, which creates new opportunities. In addition, we will need to monitor new government regulations and what their impact will be on our businesses.

- - - -

From regulatory hurdles - to increased scrutiny - to strengthening relationships with outside counsel, it’s clear that in-house counsel will have their hands full in the coming year. In addition to increased government scrutiny and regulations, I see increased regulation of the legal profession, with more laws and regulations governing the conduct of lawyers. And, while the use of value-based fee arrangements will increase, the billable hour will not disappear. I believe, however, that it will no longer be the default billing mechanism that parties use without consideration of other approaches. 

As these changes take hold, ACC will continue to respond to in-house counsel needs and challenges in the coming year through our educational programs, member communications and advocacy efforts. If you have additional thoughts and predictions, I’d love to hear from you, too.

 

EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP: I'LL KNOW IT WHEN I SEE IT

Leadership, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.  Sure there are plenty of definitions and many a book has been written and speech given on the subject, but when you ask people, what leadership means to them, you’ll get an assortment of responses.  A recent quick poll of lawyers and others in the legal industry via email and Twitter resulted in the following (140 character) thoughts:

Leadership is …

“Providing direction, setting priorities and creating an atmosphere where people want to follow,” Fred Krebs, President of the Association of Corporate Counsel

“Anticipating, listening, deciding, communicating,” Patricia R. Hatler, ACC Board Chair and Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Governance Officer at Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

“A vision of the future, persuading key players to share your view, making sure every decision furthers that view,” Patrick Lamb, partner with Chicago litigation firm Valorem Law Group.

“Doing the right thing even when it's unpopular or unconventional. Especially when.”  Jay Shepherd, attorney with the Shepherd Law Group

"Vision, creativity and perseverance. Trend-setting is NOT the same.” Glenn Manishin, partner with the international law firm of Duane Morris LLP

“Assessing priorities to set a vision, then inspiring others to achieve that shared vision through their own creativity and skills,” Timothy Corcoran, Senior Consultant with Altman Weil.

While similar traits are repeated, it’s often the actions that define a true leader and not the words. Like other subjective categories that lack clearly defined parameters, when speaking of great leadership we can cull from a famous phrase in Supreme Court history and say “I’ll know it when I see it.”

The pressure to “lead” has never been so strong and as everyone tries to keep up with the changes taking place, strong leadership will be the catalyst for long-term growth, stability and success.  Lawyers (both in-house and at law firms), too, are faced with these same pressures - to “do more with less” and to make their practices more efficient while still growing the bottom line.  Overcoming the obstacles and being able to lead so that, as Krebs pointed out, “people want to follow,” will be key to their survival.

But what’s a lawyer to do to stand out from the pack? How will the drive toward being a great leader engender buy-in and lead to success?  Have you assessed your own leadership skills lately?  Are you prepared for the challenges ahead? 

Several sessions during ACC’s Annual Meeting in Boston addressed the issue of leadership, and what struck me was the interesting parallel between effective leadership today versus examples from the past.  Ivan Fong, General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, shared his thoughts in relation to modern-day leadership, while Pulitzer Prize winning author, Doris Kearns Goodwin, offered an historical view of leadership as illuminated in her latest book, “Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln.” The common thread with both was their emphasis on the importance of personal relationships – of caring and listening and a commitment to character - that set true leaders apart. 

At the heart of “Team of Rivals,” was Lincoln’s ability to “bring people together” and his success, as Goodwin explained, was “the result of a character that had been forged by experiences that raised him above his more privileged and accomplished rivals.”  Those around him would be hard-pressed to be mad at Lincoln, because inevitably, his power, his charm and his intelligence would bring people around, to be an ally. In some instances, this means taking charge, by letting go.

If you are, or have been, in a leadership role, then chances are you have had to deal with people who might not agree with your decisions.  Great leaders don’t lead by trying to make everyone happy. Instead, they bring them into the process.  As Harvard’s president, Drew Gilpin Faust, aptly pointed out in a recent New York Times interview, “if people feel they were listened to, that their views were taken into account, that they had a chance to show you the world from their point of view, they’re going to be much more likely to go along with a decision.” 

The ability to engender trust, Fong explained, was at the core of being not only a good lawyer, but also an effective leader.  Specifically, “The hallmarks of being a good lawyer – the foundations on which everything is based – are the quality of the legal analysis, integrity, responsiveness, sound judgment and the ability to be a trusted advisor, all of which translate well into the public sector.”

In discussing “leadership imperatives,” Fong emphasized the importance of “beginning with the end in mind” and articulating a clear vision and compelling purpose for the organization.  A team, to be effective, needs to have a common understanding of “Why do we exist?  Where are we going?  And how are we going to get there?”  The shared mission, vision, and strategy, Fong explained, helps to inspire trust and engagement.  Regaling the possibly apocryphal story of a General’s encounter with a janitor in the halls of NASA during the 60’s, Fong explained that when the General asked the janitor what he was doing, the janitor replied, “I’m helping to send a man to the moon.”  A leader’s ability to communicate a compelling purpose – a shared vision – can inspire the entire organization to be right there with you.

Fong, like Lincoln, embraced the notion of “meeting people where they are,” of putting himself in the place of others and listening to those around him. By meeting regularly with his staff, learning about the processes already in place and gleaning insight from his direct reports, he has been able to set an agenda and establish clearly defined goals. “It’s not about working harder, longer hours,” Fong explained, “it’s also about stepping back and looking at how we do what we do and how can we stop doing things that no longer provide value.”

Using the example of a marathon, where the early runners cross the finish line before others even begin, Fong illustrated the importance of going back and putting yourself in the position of someone at the beginning of the race. Communication, another leadership imperative, can’t be emphasized enough in this regard. It’s vital for successful execution; and every organization needs it.

Goodwin, in describing Lincoln, believed one of the best indicators of a good leader was, “being able to motivate during frustration,” and in harmony with this sentiment, Fong noted, "You can tell the health of an organization by the quality of its arguments.”  These traits - overcoming obstacles and being able to lead in the midst of conflict - are vital for today’s leaders. The ability to ride out the economic waves of uncertainty, while maintaining control and respect, will propel the great leaders ahead.

Challenges, as Fong described, are where “what you do know and what you don’t know intersect.”  As a leader, you are tasked with uncovering the known and unknown and then tapping into the wisdom of those around you to help get the job done. Fong recalled his “A-Ha” moment when he realized that, while he couldn’t personally manage and lead all 1700 lawyers in his department, he could lead those lawyers within the top one or two layers, and influence their own leadership abilities.

Whether it’s gleaning insight from Fong or relishing Goodwin’s historical retrospective on Lincoln, much can be gleaned from the great leaders of today and those of the past.  Each of you will have your own style and approach, but ultimately, it will be your ability to connect with those around you - to engender trust and respect - that will be key to your own personal success as a leader. 

As you evaluate your own leadership traits, ask yourself if you are applying successful principles from the past for effective leadership today.  Specifically:

1. Are you fostering an environment of teamwork?

2. Are you addressing those that disagree with you in a way that leads to mutual understanding and buy-in?

3. Are you communicating a plan (your vision) effectively?

4. Are you evaluating processes and identifying opportunities for better alignment and efficiency?

5. Are you putting others’ interests ahead of your own?

6. Are you praising others for their contributions?

7. Are you treating everyone – at all levels – with the same respect?

8. Are you paying attention to suggestions & facilitating implementation?

9. Are you demonstrating trust, honesty and integrity?

10. Are you able to take charge by letting go?

Remember, leadership is in the eye of the beholder, and it will be the feedback and opinions of those around you that really matter. As someone that has had the privilege of getting to know Fong on a personal level, I can attest to his uncanny ability to engender trust and buy-in from those around him. Fong’s remarkable compassion, inherent interest and ability to lead in a collaborative environment are great qualities we can all learn from. And, as I have observed from my own interaction with Fong, when I encountered this great leader, “I knew it when I saw it.”

###

Susan E. Jacobsen, President of LUV2XLPR, Inc., has over 15 years of experience assisting in-house counsel, law firm attorneys and corporate executives with strategic communications initiatives.

Positive Vibe Permeates throughout ACC's 2009 Annual Meeting

ACC’s Annual Meeting in Boston might have kicked off on Sunday night, but things really got underway on Monday as thousands of in-house counsel arrived at the Hynes Convention Center to register and begin their immersion into what brought them together: learning, engaging and sharing. Having been involved with past meetings, I was struck today by the upbeat demeanor, levity and humor interspersed throughout the sessions, in the exhibit hall and with members and sponsors chatting amongst themselves. At a time when negative news seems to own the limelight, the positive, good-natured vibe was a much welcomed change.

A real treat of the day of the day (and likely to be one of the highlights of the conference) was Chair’s Choice: A View from the Frontlines, which gave attendees the unique opportunity to hear from Ivan Fong, former ACC Board Chair and currently the General Counsel of U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Fong’s first-hand account of transitioning from General Counsel at Cardinal Health to one of the largest government agencies was both captivating and insightful. He shared how managing the many hundreds of lawyers and issues at DHS were similar, as well as different, from managing lawyers and matters in-house at the companies he previously worked for. Most notably, Ivan noted that the “hallmarks of being a good lawyer – the foundations on which everything is based – were the quality of the legal analysis, responsiveness, sound judgment and the ability to be a trusted advisor, all of which translate well into the public sector.”

Fong’s candidness and honesty provided everyone with a snapshot of his day-to-day activities, as well as his long term goals for success. The session was so fascinating that it warrants its own detailed summary (To be posted on In-House ACCess following the meeting.)

 

The day’s luncheon, sponsored by Lex Mundi, drew a packed room to join ACC President Fred Krebs in welcoming in ACC’s new Board Chair, Pat Hatler, and new Board members, Sabine Chalmers, Chief Legal and Communications Officer at Anheuser-Busch Inbev; John Page, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from Golden State Foods; and Norman Wain, Vice President, Corporate Legal Affairs and Assistant General Counsel at the Finish Line

 

Krebs explained that each year in lieu of speaker fees, ACC contributes to a worthwhile charity, and this year a $5,000 donation was given to Camp Letts, a YMCA summer camp that serves youths from the inner cities of Washington, DC and Baltimore. 

 

Krebs also reminded everyone that, “Last year at this time, we predicted we would be at the 25,000 member milestone and I am happy to say we have reached that threshold. This year has truly exceeded our expectations on many fronts.”

 

He went on to acknowledge ACC’s two new chapters – the South Carolina Chapter and the North Florida Chapter, bringing the association to 51 chapters in more than 70 countries with members who represent over 10,000 organizations.

 

On a solemn note, earlier this year ACC was saddened to learn of the passing of Robert Banks, Sr., an extraordinary in house counsel for Xerox for many years and the leading founder of ACC. “Bob Banks gave us a great gift,” Krebs shared, “He gave us all an organization that permits us to change and improve our profession and ourselves. We are here today because of him.”

 

Krebs announced that ACC would be honoring Banks with the ACC Robert Banks Memorial Scholarship Fund, starting in 2010. This scholarship will help support those members who are in transition or need additional support to attend the Annual Meeting. Co-founding member, Carl Liggio, and Banks’ son, Bill Banks, were both on hand to share their heartfelt, personal memories and appreciation for Banks’ tireless efforts, dedication and historic legacy.

 

Dan Fitz, formerly Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Company Secretary at Misys and the 2009 ACC Board Chair, presented this year’s winner for Excellence in Corporate Practice to David Allgood, Executive Vice President and General Counsel at the Royal Bank of Canada. As General Counsel at one of the largest and most respected legal departments in Canada, Allgood is known as the person who sets the tone and introduces the best practices in law department management and leadership. Fitz noted that, “David's progressive posture on "value" issues, as promoted by the ACC Value Challenge, is setting both the tone and pace for other departments interested in reconnecting the cost of legal services to their actual value in the marketplace.” 

 

In addition, Fitz recognized Ogilvy Renault LLP as a firm that has gone above and beyond for their support of ACC and presented them with the 2009 President’s Award. “Not only has this firm supported ACC through advertising and sponsorships,” Fitz explained, “But they are also the lead sponsor of ACC’s popular CLO ThinkTank series of programs and they provide ACC with valuable insight on legal issues in Canada.”

 

The luncheon culminated with Pulitzer Prize winning author, Doris Kearns Goodwin, who shared her lifetime of studying and writing about great leaders with a captivating tale of her own personal observations and what everyone could learn from the great leaders she had studied. Her uncanny ability to bring history to life, to speak in pictures so as to draw everyone in, left everyone speechless. She shared her fascinating first-hand experience, as well as findings from in-depth research, and everyone hung onto her every word.  

 

The hundreds of people waiting in line to have Goodwin sign her latest book, Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, following the lunch was a true testament to the respect she garnered and the interest provoked among those in attendance. As Ivan Fong’s session earlier in the day was so enthralling that it warranted its own write up, so, too, does Goodwin’s speech. (To be posted on In-House ACCess following the meeting.)

---

Coverage of ACC’s 2009 Annual Meeting will continue with interviews with ACC’s supporters and sponsors, over 100 of the world’s leading legal industry professionals.

 

* Susan E. Jacobsen, formerly ACC’s Director of Communications, was retained by ACC to cover this year’s Annual Meeting and will be providing coverage of the sessions and networking events throughout the conference.

ACC'S 2009 Annual Meeting Kicks Off in Boston

In-house counsel and legal industry professional from around the world came together at Boston’s Hynes Convention Center as ACC kicked off its Annual Meeting with a Welcome Reception and networking event in the Exhibit Hall on Sunday evening. Over 100 event sponsors and exhibitors were on hand from international law firms, top litigation support providers and leaders in knowledge management -- all ready to interact with attendees and support the in-house counsel community. Many are returning sponsors, and some are new this year, but one thing is for certain – all are energized and ready to engage with attendees and explain what they can do to help in-house counsel, their clients and legal departments.

With the challenges many have been confronted with, along with the cuts in travel budgets, it’s a great testament to the association and the quality of programs offered that, once again, the Annual Meeting is expected to draw an impressive crowd of more than 1600 in-house counsel and over 2400 total attendees.  ACC President Fred Krebs is extremely satisfied with this year’s turnout, and noted during the Leadership Dinner later in the evening, “We have more attendees here with us this year than last year….and ACC closed out the fiscal year on September 30 with over 25,000 members worldwide.”

 

As Krebs addressed the packed room at the Leadership Dinner, he thanked Iron Mountain for their sponsorship of the evening’s event and further explained, “This year’s conference will focus on value and how to leverage resources, without comprising quality. ACC has worked with its members, chapters, committees and supporters to put together a program that, over the next three days, will provide attendees with efficiencies, tools and networking opportunities to help in-house counsel lead their departments and their companies through the challenges, as well as identify the opportunities, to thrive into the future.” 

 

Krebs was joined by outgoing Board Chair, Dan Fitz, and incoming chair, Pat Hatler, to present this year’s award winners with their much deserved recognition for outstanding achievements and support. In between bites of salmon sliders and Hoisin duck rolls, attendees applauded this year’s award winners:

 

·         Robert I. Townsend, Jr. Member of the Year: John Tanner, Senior Vice President & Division Counsel at McGriff, Seibels & Williams.

·         Committee of the Year: Employment & Labor Committee

·         Committee Member of the Year: Jeffrey R. Stern

·         Committee Sponsors of the Year: Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice  and Jackson Lewis

·         Outstanding Chapters: The Austin Chapter (Small, less than 250 members); Colorado Chapter and San Diego Chapter (Medium, 250-750 members); DELVACCA Chapter (Large, 750+ members)

·         Chapter Challenge: The Israel Chapter and the Charlotte Chapter (Small); The St. Louis Chapter (Medium); and the Chicago Chapter (Large)

.

In addition, Krebs recognized ACC’s Northeast Chapter and its President, Paul Cushing, for their unyielding support of ACC and for their assistance as host Chapter for this year’s Annual Meeting. Krebs also welcomed a number of organizations that made the trip to Boston – some so far as Australia – including, Veta Richardson, from the Minority Corporate Counsel Association; David Patience and Tony Degovrik from the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association; Rodney Moore and Maurice Foster from the National Bar Association; and Esther Lardent from the Pro Bono Institute. Accolades were capped off with recognition for the 12 past ACC Board Chairs attending this year’s Annual Meeting – a record number. 

 

As the evening drew to an end, the buzz was still going strong --- the next three days are sure to be filled with engaging encounters, interesting insights and awareness for new ideas and opportunities among the thousands of in-house counsel in Boston this week.

 

* Susan E. Jacobsen, formerly ACC’s Director of Communications, was retained by ACC to cover this year’s Annual Meeting and will be providing coverage of the sessions and networking events throughout the conference.

Lawyers and Auditors: The Perfect Storm of Privilege Issues?

"Answers to Questions You Wish Your Outside Auditor Hadn't Asked" at the ACC Annual Meeting raised lots of questions, but provided lots of solutions, too.  When it comes to privilege protection and erosion, many in-house lawyers are  terribly afraid of the threat from within: the likelihood that their auditors, newly empowered and intimidated by the PCAOB, will not be satisfied with anything less than everything you've got when assessing the fiscal health and adequacy of internal controls in their yearly, quarterly, even daily work in auditing the company's finances. 

Many folks prefer to think of privilege erosion in the government investigation context as "someone else's" problem - they believe and hope that they won't have to weather such scrutiny because their company has not been subject to a major investigation.  But auditors today are far more like adversaries or regulators than part of the corporate family of service providers (whether they like that comparison or not), and in-house counsel are well-advised to remember that in today's world of auditor "independence."  Today, privilege waiver is more likely to occur int he context of your ongoing audit relationship than it is in a government investigation: courts are more likely to deem that you've waived the privilege through your communications with auditors about internal investigations, reserves, or other legal processes than ever.  A most disturbing trend for those  interested in assuring that lawyers and auditors collaborate well in assessing the efficacy of internal controls.

Program leaders Tom Sabatino, CLO of Schering Plough, and Steve Cannon, former CLO of Circuit City (and ACC's outside counsel on privilege issues, as well as our lobbyist) are discussing the practical checklists in-house counsel should consider, along with other panelists, ACC board leader Jon Oviatt (CLO of Mayo), Catherin Englebert of Deloitte & Touche and Maryann Clifford (VP and CCO, Motorola).  Especially interesting is the sub-conversation that recent massive failures in the financial services industry will create disclosure mandates and practices that it will be hard to reverse -  will the pressure toward "transparency"  outweigh legitimate protections and rights of corporate clients?

Are lawyers from Mars and auditors from Venus?  Or do they live on some third planet together that is a long way away from what our clients  prefer that we focus our time on doing?  And how do we find our way back home?